Base64 Encode / DecodeEncode and decode Base64 in the browser.Open tool URL Encode / DecodePercent-encode and decode URL components.Open tool
Both turn data into safe-to-transmit text, but they solve different problems. Base64 re-encodes binary or text into a compact ASCII alphabet so it survives transports that only carry text. URL encoding (percent-encoding) escapes the handful of characters that aren't allowed in a URL. One is for payloads; the other is for URLs.
Use Base64 when
- You need to embed binary data (an image, a file) in text — a data URI, a JSON field, an email.
- You're encoding a payload so it survives a text-only transport intact.
- You're decoding a Base64 string back to its original bytes or text.
Use URL Encode when
- You're putting a value into a URL — a query string or path segment.
- You need to escape spaces, &, ?, =, and other reserved characters.
- You're building or reading query parameters and need them to round-trip safely.
Side by side
| Base64 Encode / Decode | URL Encode / Decode | |
|---|---|---|
| Primary job | Encode binary/text as ASCII text | Escape characters for URLs |
| Typical use | Embedding payloads, data URIs | Query strings, URL segments |
| Output | Base64 alphabet (A–Z, a–z, 0–9, +, /) | Percent-escaped (%20, %26…) |
| Reversible? | Yes — lossless decode | Yes — lossless decode |
| Handles binary? | Yes — that's the point | Byte-level, but meant for text |
| Runs 100% locally | Yes | Yes |
under the hood
Neither is encryption — both are trivially reversible encodings, not protection. If you're Base64-ing something sensitive, it's still readable to anyone who decodes it.
bottom line
If the data is going *into* a URL, URL-encode it. If the data needs to *be* text (a binary blob in a text field), Base64 it. They often appear together: a Base64 payload can still need URL-encoding if you then put it in a query string.